Grading Rubric for Poster Session
Poster ___________________________________________________________
Instructions to reviewer: Use these criteria to rate the poster presentation on a scale of 1-5 (1=strongly disagree; 3=neutral; 5=strongly agree).
Appearance | 5 is strong agreement |
1. Display attracts viewer’s attention. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
2. Words are easy to read from an appropriate distance (3-5 feet). | 1 2 3 4 5 |
3. Poster is well organized and easy to follow. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
4. Graphics and other visuals enhance presentation. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
5. The poster is neat and appealing to look at. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
Content | |
6. Content is clear and easy to understand. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
7. The question being addressed is stated clearly. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
8. I understand why someone might be interested in the question and results. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
9. Key simplifying assumptions are identified. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
10. There is enough detail about methods for me to understand the results. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
11. Poster is free of unnecessary detail. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
12. Conclusions are stated clearly. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
13. Conclusions are supported by results. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
Presentation | |
14. Presenter’s response to questions demonstrated knowledge of subject matter and project. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
15. Presenter could succinctly (2-3 minutes) describe the scope and importance of the project, major accomplishments, and recommendations. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
15. The five minute overview gave a clear picture of the scope and importance of the project, major accomplishments, and recommendations. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
Comments